Page 1 of 2

ignition timing z1a

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:18 pm
Author: z1bman
hi guys anyone had this problem when trying to set the ignition timing on a Z1A. the bike has pattern coils + points backplate assembly / new genuine i think ? advance + retard . the problem is if i set the points gap at 14 thou + then strobe it to align the F mark on the advancer the points backing plate hardly does anything to the adjustment. the only way i can get near the timing marks is to open up the points gap. when the timing marks are aligned this obviously gives me a massive points gap of 30 thou. the main points backplate has had the three mounting holes elongated by the previous owner
also if i set the points with a gap of 14 thou + strobe it the ignition timing is about 25/30 degrees retarded . i have checked the T mark on the advancer alignment when on TDC + it seems to line up with the mark in the points casing. any suggestions appreciated

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:27 pm
Author: KeithZ1R
Might be wrong here but sounds like the points heel is well worn new points ? anybody :|

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:35 pm
Author: Pigford
Save the effort and fit a Dyna S :wink: The poinst will need adjusting every few hundred miles anyhow :??

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:43 pm
Author: irhobotolo
I have a Z1 and have been farting around with points and timing for hours on end. I bought a pattern points plate with condensers etc on it and couldnt get the timing right without elongating the slots. SO ! I bought the same thing from the US but NOS original parts. Same problem. So I thought the advancer is wrong so I swapped that. Same problem !
All this time the bike is running but its like a bag of shyte.
To cut a long story short I bought a Dyna S ignition from Z1Enterprises which does away with points and condensers. I fitted it in half an hour and its like having a new engine !!!! Timing is spot on and it made me wonder why I didnt just do it to start with (and saved me hours of pulling hair out).
Just an oppinion here but but I wouldnt waste your time with points when you can fit a much better system and then forget it.

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:52 pm
Author: steve bowdler
I ran dyna s till it went tits up kept failing when engine got hot, back on points now no probs ,though will prob fit my new dyna s over winter. :roll:

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:53 pm
Author: paul doran
Pigford wrote:Save the effort and fit a Dyna S :wink: The poinst will need adjusting every few hundred miles anyhow :??


since when ?

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:00 pm
Author: Pigford
paul doran wrote:
Pigford wrote:Save the effort and fit a Dyna S :wink: The poinst will need adjusting every few hundred miles anyhow :??


since when ?


Since they were invented..... and every manufacturer switched to pointless/electronic ignition systems :roll:

I've had loads of bikes with points (including Zeds) and they are always a PITA :evil:

Its a FACT that the Dyna S is more efficient, easier to set, stays in tune and gives a stronger spark :!:

Anything else you need to know Paully :P

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:02 pm
Author: paul doran
I run My A4,Z1A and Z1B on points all run as smooth as silk and I honestly cannot remember when I had to adjust any of their points
I happen to believe if set up correctly they can run very well
I do agree Dyna are good but it,s down to preference with Me

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:06 pm
Author: Pigford
I love the idea of an old bike running with points - simples - but in reality I've never had much luck with them..... probably my lack of skill :|

Worst bike were my GT750, GT550 and me Trumpet - even the Boyer system was 10 x better than the points :!:

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:12 pm
Author: KeithZ1R
Just makes you wonder how we developed the internal combustion engine ignition system :?:..... Oh that was it we used a set of contact breaker points :roll:

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:14 pm
Author: Pigford
KeithZ1R wrote:Just makes you wonder how we developed the internal combustion engine ignition system :?:..... Oh that was it we used a set of contact breaker points :roll:



.... and total loss oil systems :|

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:16 pm
Author: pertonpc
I time my two by using the test light method as per Haynes manual.
Fit a bulb to the points spring blade and to ground on cylinder head - the bulb should light just as it gets to the F mark... if not move the points plate and/ or the points adjusters until it does.
Seems to give me better results than strobe timing - even when I have borrowed expensive strobes.
Just make sure you are doing the correct set of ponts for the markings that appear in the window.

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:47 pm
Author: Pigford
pertonpc wrote:I time my two by using the test light method as per Haynes manual.
Fit a bulb to the points spring blade and to ground on cylinder head - the bulb should light just as it gets to the F mark... if not move the points plate and/ or the points adjusters until it does.
Seems to give me better results than strobe timing - even when I have borrowed expensive strobes.
Just make sure you are doing the correct set of ponts for the markings that appear in the window.



........and what about checking the dwell angle :?: Mystic Black Art :!:

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 9:14 pm
Author: z1bman
i have tried the bulb test + strobe test but still end up with a points gap on 1+4 set of points being 30 thou + 2+3 points gap being 20 thou ? i have done a bit of research + the early type z1 has a different advancer?

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 9:37 pm
Author: Pigford
....should still be able to set/time it properly, as the advance had a different "curve", not effecting thesetting of the gap....